Concerns have been raised regarding the land upon which the Delhi High Court stands, with allegations suggesting it may be situated on property previously designated as Waqf.
During a recent hearing, Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna addressed these concerns directly, responding to arguments presented by Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who represented the petitioners. The court acknowledged that while usage of Waqf land isn’t inherently improper, significant anxieties exist surrounding its current disposition.
As Justice Khanna stated, “We are told Delhi High Court is built on Waqf Land…”
The ongoing case highlights a complex intersection of legal ownership and public interest, prompting further examination of land records and historical claims. Key points emerging from the proceedings include:
- Recognition of potential irregularities surrounding the property’s designation.
- Acknowledgment that not all Waqf usage is problematic, but concerns remain valid.
- The court’s commitment to addressing the petitioners’ arguments thoroughly.
“We are not saying all Waqf by user is wrong,” Justice Khanna continued, emphasizing a nuanced perspective on the matter and signaling a careful consideration of all angles before reaching a decision.
