New York State is considering new legislation in response to public outcry following the seizure and euthanasia of a popular pet squirrel named P’Nut, an internet sensation with nearly one million followers. The incident sparked widespread condemnation after state officials took P’Nut and another squirrel, Fred, from their upstate home last October.
The proposed bill, formally titled “Peanut’s Law: The Humane Animal Protection Act,” aims to prevent similar tragedies by implementing crucial safeguards. Key features of the act include:
* A mandatory 72-hour waiting period before the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) can authorize the euthanasia of any seized animal.
* The provision for a hearing, allowing animal owners an opportunity to contest the state’s actions prior to seizure or euthanasia.
The Longos, who operate an animal sanctuary and are P’Nut’s adoptive parents, reported they received no explanation for the animals’ removal. Both squirrels tested negative for rabies after their deaths. The incident garnered significant attention online, prompting reactions from prominent figures including Elon Musk, who referenced “the whole squirrel thing,” and former President Trump.
Assemblyman Jake Blumencranz (R-Nassau), the bill’s sponsor, emphasized the importance of due process: “This is about fairness,” he stated. “Animals should not be euthanized unless they present an imminent threat.” He further clarified that P’Nut and Fred were “rescues — loved, nurtured, and safe,” adding, “They were not dangerous. They were not sick. They were not wild threats roaming the streets.”
Mark Longo expressed his hope for a lasting impact from the legislation: “I sit here trying not to cry, but passing this law will be a movement to make sure that animal rights are not overlooked anymore.” P’Nut was orphaned at just five weeks old after his mother was struck by a car and subsequently rescued and raised by the Longos.
Supporters argue that the bill represents a reasonable approach to protecting both animals and their owners, however some feel it does not go far enough. As one advocate stated: “Here is the cold, hard truth. It is too little, too late. Words don’t save P’Nut and Fred, and words won’t save the next animal, or the next family, unless we change the law.”
The Longo family are considering legal action against the state regarding the seizure and death of their pets; however, their attorney has not yet responded to requests for comment.
